resources
Leaders dive deep into equitably expanding computer science offerings

Faced with stark data showing 61 percent of California’s high schools don’t offer any computer science courses, district and county office administrators attended a summer workshop aimed at helping them equitably implement the classes.

Ensuring access and inclusion for all students and teachers was key to the 2019 Summer of CS program hosted at the Sacramento County Office of Education on June 18, which also included a policy luncheon featuring an array of speakers representing industry, the Legislature and students. This annual multiday event was presented by the Sacramento COE, the Alliance for California Computing Education for Students and Schools (ACCESS) and CSforCA.

In addition to the dearth of California high schools offering computer science courses, a new report by the Kapor Center calls out severe equity shortcomings in instances when classes are offered. Computer Science in California’s Schools: An Analysis of Access, Enrollment, and Equity finds that:

  • Low-income and rural schools are significantly less likely to offer computer science courses.
  • Black, Latino and Native American/Native Alaskan students comprise 60 percent of California’s high school enrollment but just 16 percent of Advanced Placement computer science test-takers.
  • Seven in 10 students who take AP computer science exams pass, but there are significant racial gaps: Only four in 10 black and Latino students receive passing scores.
  • Only 29 percent of students taking introductory computer science courses are female.

The full Kapor Center report can be found at bit.ly/2FhRkk4.

Several presenters at the Sacramento event addressed these inequities, saying that children from well-off backgrounds arrive in the classroom with a “preparatory privilege” that feeds educational and cultural biases about which groups of students are capable of mastering computer science — generally perceived to be white and Asian males.

“They were familiar with the computing, they had the resources at home, so when they came into school, they appeared to be just naturals at it,” said Jane Margolis, senior researcher at UCLA’s Center X and author of the recently updated book Stuck in the Shallow End: Education, Race, And Computing.

The Kapor Center data won’t just sit on a shelf, Margolis and others said, but rather will be used to create a California School Dashboard-like tool to build the capacity of county offices, districts and schools in expanding computer science offerings and making data-informed decisions.

Margolis helped found ACCESS and the Exploring Computer Science curriculum, which started in the Los Angeles Unified School District but is now found across the nation. CSforCA, the public-facing campaign for ACCESS, has a goal of providing, by 2025, every student in California with access to rigorous computer science education.

“It’s not just about learning how to program, it’s about learning how to think.”
Emily Smith, program panelist who is a senior at Sacramento State University

Julie Flapan, ACCESS executive director and UCLA Center X Computer Science Project director, told attendees that California is making progress toward achieving that goal by way of new Computer Science Standards, a State Board of Education-approved implementation plan and through legislative efforts. Still, Flapan said, not everyone seems to realize how much of a demand there is for students to learn computer science. She cited poll data that there is a vast disconnect between the percentage of parents who want their children to learn computer science (91 percent) and the percentage of administrators who perceive a demand from parents (8 percent).

School boards are one avenue through which computer science can become a top-down priority for all students, as evidenced by San Francisco Unified School District’s resolution adopted in 2015 to expand computer science education to all students at all schools, beginning in pre-kindergarten and extending through 12th grade.

The work began in the 2013–14 school year when officials noticed computer science course enrollment mirrored the inequities of the tech industry, rather than the district’s diverse population, said Bryan Twarek, former computer science program administrator in SFUSD and new director of education for the Computer Science Teachers Association.

Using the resolution as a vision, the district piloted the computer science program by first targeting its most marginalized school sites and students, with organic growth from there. “If we focus the effort where it’s needed most, then other ones come along,” Twarek said.

Twarek and other speakers were also resolute that school leaders, teachers, parents and students need to know that 21st-century computer science goes well above and beyond typing lines of code, instead permeating nearly every industry and sector in a global economy. Beyond that, computational thinking is considered by many experts to be a new form of literacy and problem solving.

“It’s not just about learning how to program, it’s about learning how to think,” said Emily Smith, a panelist who is a senior at Sacramento State University studying computer science.

CSBA resources
  • CSBA governance brief “Supporting STEM Access, Equity, and Effectiveness: The Path to Full Implementation of Next Generation Science Standards in California”: bit.ly/2zFV3VF
  • CSBA governance brief “Supporting STEM Access, Equity, and Effectiveness: Equitable Access to Rigorous STEAM Coursework”: bit.ly/2TIr72g
  • CSBA research spotlight “Unlocking Learning: Science as a Lever for English Learner Equity”: bit.ly/2JC1rS5